https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2526828123
Saturday, May 09, 2026
Research Alert: #Attentioncontrol ability is associated with #frontoparietal control #network interactions | PNAS - #AC #PFIT #CHC #schoolpsychologists #schoolpsychology #cognition #intelligence
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2526828123
Saturday, February 07, 2026
Research alert: Executive functions and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic network analysis - #networkanalysis #executivefunctions #Gwm #AC #workingmemory #attentionalcontrol #psychopathology #schoolpsychologists #schoolpsychology #AC-Gwmcomplex
Thursday, February 05, 2026
Research alert-very important article: Beyond Working Memory Capacity: Attention Control as the Underlying Mechanism of Cognitive Abilities - #cognitive #intelligence #Gwm #attentionalcontrol #AC #workingmemory #WJIV #WJV #schoolpsychology #schoolpsychologists #cognition
Click on images to enlarge for better readability
Very important article (open source..click here to read/download) regarding cognitive functioning and working memory capacity and attentional control. For at least 15 years I’ve been monitoring research on the attentional-control working memory complex system (AC-Gwm)…(click here for numerous posts regarding the important of AC-Gwm). I’m convinced that the AC-Gwm complex system is one of the core cognitive efficiency systems that helps us understand general intellectual functioning. It has been found to be important in cognitive functioning and also in various forms of psychopathology.
Keywords: attention control; working memory capacity; executive attention; fluid intelligence; interference control; individual differences; latent-variable modeling; cognitive measurement
Thursday, January 30, 2025
Research Byte: Individual differences in #workingmemory (Gwm) and #attentionalcontrol (#AC) continue to predict memory #Gl) performance despite extensive learning—#CHC #schoolpsychology
Zhao, C., & Vogel, E. K. (2025). Individual differences in working memory and attentional control continue to predict memory performance despite extensive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001728
Abstract
Individual differences in working memory predict a wide range of cognitive abilities. However, little research has been done on whether working memory continues to predict task performance after repetitive learning. Here, we tested whether working memory ability continued to predict long-term memory (LTM) performance for picture sequences even after participants showed massive learning. In Experiments 1–3, subjects performed a source memory task in which they were presented a sequence of 30 objects shown in one of four quadrants and then were tested on each item’s position. We repeated this procedure for five times in Experiment 1 and 12 times in Experiments 2 and 3. Interestingly, we discovered that individual differences in working memory continually predicted LTM accuracy across all repetitions. In Experiment 4, we replicated the stable working memory demands with word pairs. In Experiment 5, we generalized the stable working memory demands model to attentional control abilities. Together, these results suggest that people, instead of relying less on working memory, optimized their working memory and attentional control throughout learning.
Working memory ability predicts various cognitive abilities. However, whether its predictive power remains after participants repetitively study the test materials remains unknown. Here, in five experiments with visual and verbal materials, we found that individual differences in working memory and attentional control (WMAC) constantly predicted people’s memory performance even after extensive training of the same materials. Our results provided a new understanding of WMAC, in that learning may better tune participants’ attention and working memory toward task demands, instead of eliminating the reliance on attentional control in performing tasks.
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
Research Byte: Examining #WorkingMemory Training for Healthy Adults—A Second-Order #MetaAnalysis—-#CHC #WJV #Gwm
This meta-analytic review suggests some promise for working memory training programs, although for every slightly positive research synthesis there are multiple other syntheses (and position papers) that suggest that working memory training does not transfer to real world settings or is not effective. I, being an optimist, am not ready to give up on the idea of working memory interventions to improve intellectual performance, given the central role working memory plays in cognition. There is probably some kind of individual differences X type of treatment effect interaction. See McGrew et. al. (2023) for recent psychometric network analysis paper that identifies the working memory-attentional control complex (Gwm-AC) as the most likely “target system” for effective intellectual ability interventions.
Click on image to enlarge for easier reading
Saturday, November 07, 2020
More support for the Gs—>Gwm—>—Gf/ Gc developmental cascade model as per CHC taxonomy
Sunday, May 10, 2020
Attentional control has indirect effect on Gf via working memory (Gwm)
Thursday, November 07, 2019
Individual differences in learning efficiency
Sunday, July 15, 2018
Excellent conceptual suggestion for organizing mind wandering research
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, June 2018, Vol. 22, No. 6
ABSTRACT
As empirical research on mind-wandering accelerates, we draw attention to an emerging trend in how mind-wandering is conceptualized. Previously articulated definitions of mind-wandering differ from each other in important ways, yet they also maintain overlapping characteristics. This conceptual structure suggests that mind-wandering is best considered from a family-resemblances perspective, which entails treating it as a graded, heterogeneous construct and clearly measuring and describing the specific aspect(s) of mind-wandering that researchers are investigating. We believe that adopting this family-resemblances approach will increase conceptual and methodological connections among related phenomena in the mind-wandering family and encourage a more nuanced and precise understanding of the many varieties of mind-wandering.
Click on image to enlarge

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Friday, November 10, 2017
Research Byte: Is General Intelligence Little More Than the Speed of Higher-Order Processing?
Click on images to enlarge



Article link.
Anna-Lena Schubert, Dirk Hagemann, and Gidon T. Frischkorn Heidelberg University
ABSTRACT
Individual differences in the speed of information processing have been hypothesized to give rise to individual differences in general intelligence. Consistent with this hypothesis, reaction times (RTs) and latencies of event-related potential have been shown to be moderately associated with intelligence. These associations have been explained either in terms of individual differences in some brain-wide property such as myelination, the speed of neural oscillations, or white-matter tract integrity, or in terms of individual differences in specific processes such as the signal-to-noise ratio in evidence accumulation, executive control, or the cholinergic system. Here we show in a sample of 122 participants, who completed a battery of RT tasks at 2 laboratory sessions while an EEG was recorded, that more intelligent individuals have a higher speed of higher-order information processing that explains about 80% of the variance in general intelligence. Our results do not support the notion that individuals with higher levels of general intelligence show advantages in some brain-wide property. Instead, they suggest that more intelligent individuals benefit from a more efficient transmission of information from frontal attention and working memory processes to temporal-parietal processes of memory storage.
Keywords: ERP latencies, event-related potentials, intelligence, processing speed, reaction times
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Thursday, December 29, 2016
Research Byte: A closer look at who "chokes under pressure" - importance of attentional control (AC)
Highlights
- •
- High pressure settings compromise working memory and decrease cognitive performance.
- •
- Those with higher working memory show greatest pressure-induced cognitive deficits.
- •
- Attentional control alters relation of working memory to performance under pressure.
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Research byte: The role of attentional control (AC) and working memory in sports performance: A review of recent literature
Working Memory, Attentional Control, and Expertise in Sports: A Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research
Keywords
- Dual-process;
- Working memory;
- Attention;
- Sport;
- Individual differences
Research byte: Multi-domain training may improve attentional control (AC) in older adults
Abstract
Friday, February 26, 2016
White matter matters! An oldie-but-goodie (OBG) post
White matter matters!
Monday, January 11, 2016
Your brain is a time machine: An oldie-but-goodie (OBG) post
Time and space are the two fundamental dimensions of our lives. All forms of human behavior require us to process and understand information we receive from our environment in either spatial or temporal patterns. Even though mental timing (temporal processing) research is in a stage of infancy (when compared to spatial processing) important insights regarding the human brain clock have emerged.
Below is a list (albeit incomplete) of some of the major conclusions regarding the human brain clock. The sources for these statements come from my review of the temporal processing and brain clock literature during the past five years. Most of this information has been disseminated at the Brain Clock blog or the Brain Clock Evolving Web of Knowledge (EWOK). The goal of this post is to provide a Readers Digest summary of the major conclusions. This material can serve as a set of "talking points" at your next social event where you can impress your friends and family as you explain why you use the high-tech IM "clapper" (with a cowbell tone no less) either as a provider or as client.
Our brains measure time constantly. It's hard to find any complex human behavior where mental timing is not involved. Timing is required to walk, talk, perform complex movements and coordinate information flow across the brain for complex human thought. Think about moving your arm and hand to grasp a coffee cup. The messages to perform this task originate in your brain, which is not directly connected to your arm, hands and fingers. The ability to perform the necessary motor movements is possible only because the mind and extremities are connected via timing. Precisely timed neural messages connect your brain and extremities. You are a time machine.

Humans are remarkably proficient at internally perceiving and monitoring time to produce precisely timed behaviors and thinking. “We are aware of how long we have been doing a particular thing, how long it has been since we last slept, and how long it will be until lunch or dinner. We are ready, at any moment, to make complex movements requiring muscle coordination with microsecond accuracy, or to decode temporally complex auditory signals in the form of speech or music. Our timing abilities are impressive…” (Lewis & Walsh, 2005, p. 389).
To deal with time, humans have developed multiple timing systems that are active over more than 10 orders of magnitude with various degrees of precision (see figure below from Buhusi & Meck, 2005). These different timing systems can be classified into three general classes (viz., circadian, interval, and millisecond timing), each associated with different behaviors and brain structures and mechanisms. The fastest timing system (millisecond or interval timing) is involved in a numerous human behaviors such as speech and language, music perception and production, coordinated motor behaviors, attention, and thinking. This fast interval timing system is the most important timing system for understanding and diagnosing clinical disorders and for developing and evaluating effective treatment interventions for educational and rehabilitation settings. It is this timing system, and the relevant research, that is relevant to understanding Interactive Metronome. (Note. See my conflict of interest statement at this blog. I have an ongoing consulting relationship with IM).

Although there is consensus that the human brain contains some kind of clock, the jury is still out on the exact brain mechanisms and locations. It is also not clear whether there is one functional master clock or a series of clocks deployed in different brain areas. The areas of the brain most consistently associated with milli-second interval mental timing are the cerebellum, anterior cingulate, basal ganglia, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right parietal cortex, motor cortex, and the frontal-striatal loop. That is a mouthful of technical brain terms. But, if you can memorize them and have them roll of your tongue with ease you will “shock and awe” your family and friends. Most of these areas of the brain are illustrated below. Now, if you really want to demonstrate your expertise, get your own illustrated “brain-in-a-pocket”. These images were generated by the free 3D Brain app available for your iPhone or iPad. Even cooler is the fact that you can rotate the images with your finger! You can give neuroanatomy lessons anytime…anywhere!



Research suggests that mental interval timing is controlled by two sub-systems. The automatic timing system processes discrete-event (discontinuous) timing in milliseconds. The cognitively-controlled timing system deals with continuous-event timing (in seconds) that requires controlled attention and working memory. Both systems are likely involved in IM. For example, the synchronized clapping requires motor planning and execution, functions most associated with the automatic timing system. However, the cognitive aspects of IM (focus, controlled attention, executive functions) invoke the cognitively controlled timing system. Aren’t these brain images awesome?

The dominant model in the brain clock research literature is that of a centralized internal clock that functions as per the pacemaker–accumulator model. Briefly, this is a model where an oscillator beating at a fixed frequency generates tics that are detected by a counter. For now I am just going to tease you with an image of this model. You can read more about this model at the Brain Clock blog.

Research suggests that the brain mechanisms underlying mental timing can be fine-tuned (modified) via experience and environmental manipulation. Modifiability of mental interval timing and subsequent transfer suggest a domain-general timing mechanism that, if harnessed via appropriately designed timing-based interventions, may improve human performance in a number of important cognitive and motor domains.













