Showing posts with label cog-ach relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cog-ach relations. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2024

Research Byte: Beyond Individual #Tests: Youths’ #Cognitive Abilities, Basic #Reading, and #Writing—relevant to #schoolpsychologists #CHC

An impressive multiple test-battery CHC theory cognitive and achievement (cross-battery) confirmatory factor analysis study based on a research design first conceptualized by Jack McArdle (planned missing data reference variable design) that finds that multiple broad CHC abilities are important in explaining reading and writing achievement above and beyond psychometric g.  Of course, the results would be different if a bi-factor model were run (see McGrew et al., 2023 for discussion of three major classes of cognitive-achievement CFA/SEM research designs).  

Click here to download/read this open access articles. 

This research group, IMHO, does some of the best CFA/SEM modeling in the assessment and school psychology literature.

Click on images to enlarge for easier viewing.



Beyond Individual Tests: Youths’ Cognitive Abilities, Basic Reading, and Writing 

by  1,*,  1,  2 and  3
1
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA
2
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
3
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. 
J. Intell. 2024, 12(11), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110120
Abstract

Broadly, individuals’ cognitive abilities influence their academic skills, but the significance and strength of specific cognitive abilities varies across academic domains and may vary across age. Simultaneous analyses of data from many tests and cross-battery analyses can address inconsistent findings from prior studies by creating comprehensively defined constructs, which allow for greater generalizability of findings. The purpose of this study was to examine the cross-battery direct effects and developmental differences in youths’ cognitive abilities on their basic reading abilities, as well as the relations between their reading and writing achievement. Our sample included 3927 youth aged 6 to 18. Six intelligence tests (66 subtests) and three achievement tests (10 subtests) were analyzed. Youths’ general intelligence (g, large direct and indirect effects), verbal comprehension–knowledge (large direct effect), working memory (large direct effect), and learning efficiency (moderate direct effect) explained their basic reading skills. The influence of g and fluid reasoning were difficult to separate statistically. Most of the cognitive–basic reading relations were stable across age, except the influence of verbal comprehension–knowledge (Gc), which appeared to slightly increase with age. Youths’ basic reading had large influences on their written expression and spelling skills, and their spelling skills had a large influence on their written expression skills. The directionality of the effects most strongly supported the direct effects from the youths’ basic reading to their spelling skills, and not vice versa.

Sunday, November 10, 2024

Research Byte: A special contribution from #spatial ability to #math word problem solving: Evidence from #SEM and #networkanalysis

 

Click here to see journal page.

Abstract

There is a growing body of research into the factors contributing to math word problem solving. However, these studies usually use limited number of potential predictors (precluding assessing of their contribution in comparison with other factors or “g” general intelligence) and some predictors (such as analogical and hypothetical reasoning) are largely omitted. Thus, the aim of the current study was to explore contributions of different types of reasoning to math word problem solving and whether these contributions have added value compared with each other and general cognitive ability. Chinese schoolchildren in Grades 3 (N = 199; Mage = 102.4 months), 4 (N = 162; Mage = 114.6), 5 (N = 174; Mage = 126.1) and 6 (N = 180; Mage = 138.6) completed 8 tasks tapping into spatial, mechanical, verbal, mathematic, hypothetical and analogical reasoning. Our data showed that when 6 general cognitive factors load onto General cognitive ability factor in a Structural Equation Model (SEM), only spatial visualization has additional contribution to Word problem solving factor. Gaussian Graphical models (GGMs) showed that 2 verbal tasks and spatial visualization showed stable (present in at least 3 out of 4 grades) contributions to both word problem solving tasks. Analogical reasoning showed contribution to process of word problem solving only. To sum up, both SEM and GGMs converged on the importance of spatial ability for math word problems solving. Our results call for verbal and spatial ability to be routinely assessed and targeted by educational interventions within math curriculum.

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Meta-analytic SEM of literacy and language development relations

Using Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modeling to Study Developmental Change in Relations Between Language and Literacy. Article link.

Jamie M. Quinn Richard K. Wagner

The purpose of this review was to introduce readers of Child Development to the meta-analytic structural equa-tion modeling (MASEM) technique. Provided are a background to the MASEM approach, a discussion of its utility in the study of child development, and an application of this technique in the study of reading compre-hension (RC) development. MASEM uses a two-stage approach: first, it provides a composite correlation matrix across included variables, and second, it fits hypothesized a priori models. The provided MASEM application used a large sample (N = 1,205,581) of students (ages 3.5–46.225) from 155 studies to investigate the factor structure and relations among components of RC. The practical implications of using this technique to study development are discussed.

Click on images to enlarge.









- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Research Byte: Cognitive Mediators of Reading Comprehension in Early Development

Cognitive Mediators of Reading Comprehension in Early Development

Scott L. Decker & Julia Englund Strait & Alycia M. Roberts & Emma Kate Wright.

Contemp School Psychol DOI 10.1007/s40688-017-0127-0

Abstract

Although the empirical relationship between general intelligence and academic achievement is well established, that between specific cognitive abilities and achievement is less so. This study investigated the rela-tionships between specific Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading comprehension across a large sample of children (N = 835) at different periods of reading development (grades 1–5). Results suggest se-lect cognitive variables predict reading comprehension above and beyond basic reading skills. However, the rel-ative importance of specific cognitive abilities in predicting reading comprehension differs across grade levels. Further analyses using mediation models found specific cognitive abilities mediated the effects of basic reading skills on reading comprehension. Implications for the important and dynamic role of cognitive abilities in predicting reading comprehension across development are discussed.

From discussion

The results from this study supported our general hypothesis that specific cognitive abilities are important for reading com-prehension and the predictors change across grade. Specifically, measures of fluid reasoning (Gf) and auditory processing (Ga) appear to be most important for predicting reading comprehension performance (as measured by the pas-sage comprehension subtest) in the early elementary grades, while long-term retrieval (Glr) appears as a significant predic-tor in grades 3–4. Crystallized knowledge (Gc) appears to be important across all five early grade levels, consistent with previous studies (e.g., Floyd et al. 2007; Hajovsky et al. 2014). Reading decoding skills (as measured by the Letter-Word ID subtest) predicted reading comprehension across all elementary grade levels, also consistent with previous studies (e.g., Floyd et al. 2012), and reading fluency (reading fluency subtest) predicted reading comprehension in grades 2–5.

Click on images to enlarge.
















- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad