Showing posts with label diagnosis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diagnosis. Show all posts

Saturday, October 15, 2011

WHO ICF system of disability classification

Not to many practicing assessment professionals are familiar with the World Health Organizations International Health Classification system, a system with some good concepts related to disability Dx and disability functional issues. The following article presents a nice overcview (double click on images to enlarge)

- iPost using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Can cognitive tests differentiate Alzhemers from vascular dementia?

Can cognitive ability tests differentially diagnosis Alzheimer's from Vascular-Dementia?  A recent meta-analysis  (see reference below) suggests that the answer is "no"---cognitive measures need to be augmented by other diagnostic techniques when trying to differentiate Alzheimer's from Vascular Dementia.
  • Mathias, J. L. & Burke, J.  (2009).  Cognitive Functioning in Alzheimer’s and Vascular Dementia:A Meta-Analysis.  Neuropsychology, 23(4), 411–423

Abstract (underlining is emphasis added by blogmaster)
Differentiating between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) remains difficult but important if existing pharmacological treatments are to provide symptomatic relief in the case of AD or to alter disease progression in the case of VaD. Cognitive assessments play an important role in aiding diagnosis, despite a lack of clear evidence defining the cognitive abilities and tests that best distinguish between the two types of dementia. The current study therefore completed a meta-analysis of research comparing the cognitive abilities of persons diagnosed with AD and VaD. A comprehensive search was undertaken of the PubMed and PsychInfo databases, with 81 studies being eligible for inclusion. Weighted Cohen’s d effect sizes, percentage overlap statistics, fail-safe Ns, and confidence intervals were calculated for all cognitive tests. Of the tests that were examined by more than one study, there was one test of perception and one test of verbal memory that showed large and significant group differences. There were an additional 12 tests that may prove useful. However, all cognitive tests were limited in their ability to discriminate between AD and VaD, suggesting that they should be used cautiously and only in conjunction with other information (imaging, medical history) when diagnosing patients.
The authors conclusion
In summary, the findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the neuropsychological tests that best discriminate between AD and VaD are the Emotional Recognition task (Shimokawa et al., 2000; Shimokawa et al., 2003), and Delayed Story recall, as assessed by WMS Logical Memory (Wechsler, 1987) Adult Memory and Information Processing Battery (Coughlan & Hollows, 1985), and Babcock Story Recall (Spinnler & Tognoni, 1987). However, it is important to note that none of the tests showed acceptably low overlap between the scores of the two groups to confidently discriminate between the two types of dementia. These cognitive tests must therefore be used cautiously and in conjunction with other diagnostic information, such as medical history, behavioral observations, imaging, and information from relatives, when making a diagnosis.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,