Showing posts with label neuropsychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neuropsychology. Show all posts

Thursday, March 12, 2026

Research alert: Life-and-death psychometrics: Generalizable best methods for combing scores in intellectual disability and other diagnostic assessments - #pschometrics #Atkins #SCOTUS #IQ #intelligence #ID #intellectualdisability #AAIDD

Click on image to enlarge for better viewing 



Click here for the Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology article page.


Abstract

A diagnosis of intellectual disability is a momentous event that can determine eligibility for special services and supportive sources of income, and in the criminal arena, it can be a matter of life and death. For criminal defendants who might otherwise face capital punishment, it is a matter of life and death. Individuals evaluated for intellectual disability often have been given multiple intelligence tests, sometimes with results falling on both sides of the diagnostic threshold. In all cases, the diagnostic decision must be based on a rigorous examination of the totality of evidence in the context of systematic clinical judgment. When multiple IQ results are relevant and comparable, they can be combined into a properly computed composite score to assist the clinician charged with diagnostic responsibility in determining if Prong 1, deficits in intellectual functioning, of the three-prong criteria necessary for an intellectual disability diagnosis has been met. Best psychometrically grounded methods for these calculations are presented along with a discussion of inappropriate approaches for accurately combining multiple scores. To make these methods accessible to professionals outside the discipline of psychology, all calculations are fully explained in the context of foundational concepts. 

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

IQs Corner: Practice effects persist over two decades of cognitive testing: Implications for longitudinal research - #practiceeffect #cognitive #neurocognit #IQ #intelligence #schoolpsychology #schoolpsychologists

Click on image to enlarge for easy reading


MedRxiv preprint available at.  https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.16.25329587

Elman et al. (2025)


ABSTRACT 

Background: Repeated cognitive testing can boost scores due to practice effects (PEs), yet it remains unclear whether PEs persist across multiple follow-ups and long durations. We examined PEs across  multiple assessments from midlife to old age in a nonclinical sample.   

Method: Men (N=1,608) in the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging (VETSA) underwent 
neuropsychological assessment comprising 30 measures across 4 waves (~6-year testing intervals) spanning up to 20 years. We leveraged age-matched replacement participants to estimate PEs at each wave. We compared cognitive trajectories and MCI prevalence using unadjusted versus PE-adjusted scores. 

Results: Across follow-ups, a range of 7-12 tests (out of 30) demonstrated significant PEs, especially in episodic memory and visuospatial domains. Adjusting for PEs resulted in improved detection of cognitive decline and MCI, with up to 20% higher MCI prevalence.  

Conclusion: PEs persist across multiple assessments and decades underscoring the 
importance of accounting for PEs in longitudinal studies.
  
Keywords: practice effects; repeat testing; serial testing; longitudinal testing; mild cognitive impairment; cognitive change

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Research Byte: Performance- and report-based measures of #executivefunction as predictors of children’s #academic skills - #neuropsychology #schoolpsychology



DeCamp, C., Alfonso, S. V., & Lonigan, C. J. (2025). Performance- and report-based measures of executive function as predictors of children’s academic skills. Neuropsychology, 39(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000992

Abstract

Objective: Executive function (EF) is thought to be a core component of various cognitive processes. Two common ways to measure EF are through report-based measures that assess EF by collecting informant(s) reports on children’s behaviors and performance-based measures that assess EF through the completion of a task related to EF dimension(s). However, most research reports low associations between these measures. The goal of this study was to determine the unique and overlapping contributions of a report- and a performance-based measure of EF on children’s academic outcomes over time. Method: The sample consisted of 1,152 children (636 boys, 516 girls) who were part of a large-scale preschool intervention study. Children completed measures of academic achievement in kindergarten, first grade, and second grade, and they completed a performance-based measure of EF in kindergarten; teachers reported on children’s EF during the fall of kindergarten. Structural growth modeling was utilized to determine the unique and shared contributions of EF measures on concurrent ability and growth of academic outcomes. Results: Structural growth models indicated that the separate EF measures were both significant predictors of concurrent ability and growth of all academic outcomes, with one exception; the Head–Toes–Knees–Shoulders task was not a significant predictor of growth in math skills. Conclusions: Results of this study suggested that report- and performance-based measures of EF should not be used interchangeably, and these findings have implications for the utility of EF as a risk factor for poor academic achievement.

Thursday, March 31, 2016

Research Byte: Multivariate Associations of Fluid Intelligence (Gf) and NAA--more P-FIT model support

When it rains--it pours.  Second posting today of research study reinforcing the importance of the P-FIT neuro-model of intelligence.

 
Multivariate Associations of Fluid Intelligence and NAA

  1. Ryan J. Larsen1
+ Author Affiliations
  1. 1Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology
  2. 2Neuroscience Program and
  3. 3Psychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
  4. 4Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  5. 5Psychology Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  1. Address correspondence to Aki Nikolaidis. Email: g.aki.nikolaidis@gmail.com

Abstract

Understanding the neural and metabolic correlates of fluid intelligence not only aids scientists in characterizing cognitive processes involved in intelligence, but it also offers insight into intervention methods to improve fluid intelligence. Here we use magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) to measure N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), a biochemical marker of neural energy production and efficiency. We use principal components analysis (PCA) to examine how the distribution of NAA in the frontal and parietal lobes relates to fluid intelligence. We find that a left lateralized frontal-parietal component predicts fluid intelligence, and it does so independently of brain size, another significant predictor of fluid intelligence. These results suggest that the left motor regions play a key role in the visualization and planning necessary for spatial cognition and reasoning, and we discuss these findings in the context of the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory of intelligence.

Research Byte: Frontal and Parietal Cortices Show Different Spatiotemporal Dynamics across Problem-solving Stages--Is the P-FIT it?


Yet another study supporting the P-FIT neuro model of intelligence. Overview of P-FIT here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parieto-frontal_integration_theory

I have previously provided an overview of the P-FIT model of intelligence at the Interactive Metronome-Home blog.

Frontal and Parietal Cortices Show Different Spatiotemporal Dynamics across Problem-solving Stages. - PubMed

Arithmetic problem-solving can be conceptualized as a multistage process ranging from task…

Read it on Flipboard


Read it on ncbi.nlm.nih.gov




Tuesday, August 05, 2014

The Richard Woodcock Institute for Advancement of Cognitive Assessment: Oct, 25, 2014

The 2nd Richard Woodcock Institute for Advancement of Cognitive Assessment is now scheduled and enrollment is open. Registration and additional information can be found at the WMF web page.

Click in image to enlarge.




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Tuesday, March 05, 2013

The Science Behiind Interactive Metronome: An Integration of Temporal Processing, Brain Clock, Brain Network and Neurocognitive Research and Theory


The second MindHub Pub working paper is now available:  The Science Behind Interactive Metronome:  An Integration of Brain Clock, Temporal Processing, Brain Network and Neurocognitive Research and Theory.  The PDF document can be viewed/downloaded by click here.

This working paper is an integration of research and theory that attempts to explain the science behind the positive outcomes of the Interactive Metronome rehabilitative and brain training neurotechnology (the IM effect).  A three-level explanatory model involving three different levels of brain and neurocognitive constructs (McGrew, 2012) is described.   The three-levels are presented in the visual summary in the figure below.  Although the text focuses on explaining the IM effect on cognitive functions (focus, controlled attention, working memory, executive functions), the three-level hypothesized model should be considered a general explanatory framework for understanding the positive IM effect in other human performance domains as well (e.g., recovery from stroke; gait; motor coordination).

 The three-level model described here can also be viewed as an IM-free integration of research and theory that explains the relations between the temporal processing (temporal g) of the human brain clock (s), brain regions and networks, brain network communication and synchronization (the parietal-frontal integration theory of intelligence [P-FIT] in particular), and the neurocognitive constructs of controlled attention (focus), working memory, and executive functioning.

[Click on image to enlarge]

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

The NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function to be unveiled





Meeting Unveils NIH Neurological, Behavioral Toolbox for Clinical Research

Registration is now open for “Unveiling the NIH Toolbox”, a free scientific conference Sept. 10-11 presenting the NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function— a set of brief but comprehensive neurological and behavioral health measurements designed for use particularly in large-scale research studies such as epidemiological studies or clinical trials. Developed by a team of more than 250 scientists from nearly 100 academic institutions, the NIH Toolbox provides a battery of on-line and royalty-free measures of motor, cognitive, sensory and emotional function for study participants aged 3 to 85 years. Developed under the auspices of the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, a coalition that creates new tools and resources to advance neuroscience research, the highly anticipated NIH Toolbox promotes economies of scale and enhanced efficiency in measurement.

Taking place in Bethesda, Md., the meeting features lectures, interactive demonstrations and panel discussions about the development, testing and use of the NIH Toolbox in biomedical research. An optional “Administering the NIH Toolbox” training workshop follows the conference on Sept. 12-15. To register for the conference and/or training workshop or to learn more about the NIH Toolbox



Posted using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad
www.themindhub.com

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

AP101 Brief #14: Inappropriate use of demographically-adjusted (Heaton) norms in MR/ID Dx

The following AP 101 brief was just posted at the ICDP blog.




Applied Psychometrics 101 Brief # 14:  Demographically adjusted neuropsychological (Heaton) norm-based scores are inappropriate for the diagnosis of MR/ID

Kevin S. McGrew, PhD.
Director

Dale G. Watson, PhD.
Berkeley, CA

Sunday, May 06, 2012

EDDA 2012 ADHD newsletter article




Newsletter article regarding 2012 Las Vegas conference available here.

Posted using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad
www.themindhub.com

Monday, March 12, 2012

Research Byte: Implications of select psychometric issues for neuropsych assessment

Interesting food for thought in this article. Click on image to enlarge




- Posted using BlogPress from Kevin McGrew's iPad

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

New Neuropsych blog

Dr. Fiorana Bardenhagen, a neuropsychologist I meet while presenting down under in Australia has started a new blog--the Neurospych Bookkworm. I am adding it to my blogroll and RSS feed reader. Looking forward to learning new stuff. Good luck Fiorana.

Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Thinking..fast and slow: Dual process models of cognition/intelligence--hot topic

Dual cognitive process (sometimes called Type I/II processing) have increased in prominence the past five years.  Within the past few weeks the long anticipated book "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kaneham was released, and it is already near the top of most non-fiction best selling books.  I can't wait to get my copy, as it will put Malcom Gladwell's "Blink" in it's proper place.  This will give the layperson, and many professionals, a better understanding of these two general classes of cognitive processes.

My thinking about applied intelligence test development and interpretation has been incorporated this general dichotomy in the form of a working (evolving) test development/interpretation framework (see summary figure below).
[Double click on images to enlarge]

The most recent journal to devote a special issue to dual process models is Developmental Review.  Below are the key articles and a few intriguing model figures.















Generated by: Tag Generator