Another Atkins MR/IQ court decision revolving around IQ score issues, this time the Stanford-Binet V. Affidavit provided by SB5 test author. Oral arguments available to listen to. The decision should remind all psychologist re: the importance of following standardized testing procedures when administering an intelligence test. More information at ICDP sister blog.
Technorati Tags: psychology, forensic psychology, criminal psychology, criminal justice, psychology and law, Atkins case, MR, mental retardation, intellectual disability, SB5, SB V, Stanford Binet Intelligence test, standardized testing, death penalty, capital punishment
Technorati Tags: psychology, forensic psychology, criminal psychology, criminal justice, psychology and law, Atkins case, MR, mental retardation, intellectual disability, SB5, SB V, Stanford Binet Intelligence test, standardized testing, death penalty, capital punishment
No comments:
Post a Comment