Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
Friday, October 31, 2008
Lifetime of IQ research by Deary book
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
A Lifetime of Intelligence
Follow-Up Studies of the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947
Ian J. Deary, PhD; Lawrence J. Whalley, PhD; and John M. Starr, PhD
285 pages. List price: $69.95. APA member/Affiliate price: $49.95
ISBN 978-1-4338-0400-7 Item # 4318049
http://books.apa.org/books.cfm?id=4318049
To order APA books call 800-374-2721, fax to 202-336-5502, or visit www.apa.org/books.
You are receiving this e-mail because you have indicated an interest in new APA publications. To cancel or modify your account with PsycALERTs, please visit http://notify.apa.org/
Labels:
book nook
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Multitasking may not be good for you
Interesting post from PSYCH CENTRAL on the price paid in poor learning
when we multitasking.
when we multitasking.
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2008/10/30/learning-to-multitask-dont-bother/
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
Global brain fitness comsortium
As usual another great post from SHARP BRAINS.
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
An IQ Brain Clock explains g?
Is there a brain clock mechanism that explains g (general intelligence)? See post on IQ's Corner's sister blog (The IQ Brain Clock) for more information.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
New national center for parents
Thanks to the BRAIN INJURY blog for this FYI
http://braininjury.blogs.com/braininjury/2008/10/assistance-for-parents-with-disabilities.html
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
Monday, October 27, 2008
Brain teasers
From the always great Sharp Brains
http://m.beta.bloglines.com/items?mode=unread&subid=39777030&sort=desc
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
More on brain function and math
See post at ENL blog.
http://eideneurolearningblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/mental-math-and-dyscalculia-in-brain.html
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
Labels:
brain location,
dyscalculia,
math
Friday, October 24, 2008
WJ test reliability over time
"A test does not change from one time to another: people do. There may be considerable change on some traits, but relatively little on others. Test-retest studies evaluate the tendency for change in people, not some aspect of test quality. A test that does not reflect such changes in human traits would be an insensitive measure of those traits" (McGrew, Werder, & Woodcock, 199, p. 99).
Over on the NASP Listserv Dr. Gary Canivez asked the following question, in response to a post regarding changes in scores on the K-ABC and WJ---"Does anyone have references for long-term stability of WJ or KABC-2 scores? I'd be interested in references for such studies."
There was a very sophisticated test-retest study reported in the WJ-R Technical Manual (McGrew, Werder & Woodcock, 1991) (click here to view/download). Unfortunately it is in a test technical manual...a document that is too often ignored once a test is purchased. Additonal information can be found in the following article.
And then, of course, a person's state (concentration, anxiety, fatigue, etc.) at any testing moment can impact test performance...and test's sensitive to these states (e.g., Gsm, Gs) will likely reflect these temporary state fluctuations. This reflects state variance...which is NOT a problem with the measure...the measure is accurately reflecting how the person is doing at that time. School psychologists (and others who do psychological testing), unfortunately, typically receive measurement training that only talks about simple test-retest reliability studies and results....a diservice to our profession. We need to understand our instruments better. Properly designed test-retest studies, where the retest interval is varied, can help identify and portion the difference sources of test score variance to the appropriate sources of stable or unstable change score variance.
Read the WJ-R technical manual excerpt in particular. It is the most readable and understandable of the two sources I've included in this post.
Technorati Tags: psychology, school psychology, educational psychology, neuropsychology, psychometrics, reliability, test-retest, measurement, WJ-R, WJ III, K-ABC, KABC-II, Woodcock Johnson
Over on the NASP Listserv Dr. Gary Canivez asked the following question, in response to a post regarding changes in scores on the K-ABC and WJ---"Does anyone have references for long-term stability of WJ or KABC-2 scores? I'd be interested in references for such studies."
There was a very sophisticated test-retest study reported in the WJ-R Technical Manual (McGrew, Werder & Woodcock, 1991) (click here to view/download). Unfortunately it is in a test technical manual...a document that is too often ignored once a test is purchased. Additonal information can be found in the following article.
- McArdle, J. J., FerrerCaja, E., Hamagami, F., & Woodcock, R. W. (2002). Comparative longitudinal structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 115-142. (click to view)
And then, of course, a person's state (concentration, anxiety, fatigue, etc.) at any testing moment can impact test performance...and test's sensitive to these states (e.g., Gsm, Gs) will likely reflect these temporary state fluctuations. This reflects state variance...which is NOT a problem with the measure...the measure is accurately reflecting how the person is doing at that time. School psychologists (and others who do psychological testing), unfortunately, typically receive measurement training that only talks about simple test-retest reliability studies and results....a diservice to our profession. We need to understand our instruments better. Properly designed test-retest studies, where the retest interval is varied, can help identify and portion the difference sources of test score variance to the appropriate sources of stable or unstable change score variance.
Read the WJ-R technical manual excerpt in particular. It is the most readable and understandable of the two sources I've included in this post.
Technorati Tags: psychology, school psychology, educational psychology, neuropsychology, psychometrics, reliability, test-retest, measurement, WJ-R, WJ III, K-ABC, KABC-II, Woodcock Johnson
Labels:
EdPsych,
IQ scores,
IQ tests,
psychometrics,
reliability,
WJ III,
WJ-R
Thursday, October 23, 2008
WISC-III/WJ III cross-battery Guttman 2-D Radex analysis
One more WISC-III/WJ III cross-battery analysis--this time a 2-D Guttman Radex MDS model (click here). As readers have noted, I've been on a bit of a data analysis binge this past week (in preparation for writing a manuscript---and after being refreshed by an actual 2+ week vacation) and have reported: (a) WISC-III/WJ III cross-battery g+specific cog-ach relations SEM, (b) WJ III 2-D Guttman Radex MDS of WJ III norm sample ages 6-8, and (c) WJ III 3-D Guttman Radex MDS of ages 9-13 of norm sample. It is hoped these analyses provide useful information in understanding the characteristics of the tests in the WJ III and Wechsler intelligence batteries.
Unfortunately this analysis is based on the WISC-III and not the more recent WISC-IV. Nevertheless, the results still provide useful information on the WISC-III tests that are still present in the WISC-IV.
Given all I've written regarding the various MDS models, I'm going to only make a few comments and hope others take the presentation of these data to engage in additional discussion, interpretion, etc.----have some fun.
A few observations/comments:
A couple caveats I provided the other day are also relevant here--(a) I'm a coauthor of the WJ III (conflict of interest disclosure) and (b) these results have not been peer-reviewed
Unfortunately this analysis is based on the WISC-III and not the more recent WISC-IV. Nevertheless, the results still provide useful information on the WISC-III tests that are still present in the WISC-IV.
Given all I've written regarding the various MDS models, I'm going to only make a few comments and hope others take the presentation of these data to engage in additional discussion, interpretion, etc.----have some fun.
A few observations/comments:
- Gv tests (both WISC-III and WJ III) continue to surface on the more outer rings of the MDS models---suggesting that they are more lower-level perceptual/processing measures and do not capture complex Gv cognitive processing. See my Gv comments on this the other day. The same can be said for Ga tests.
- WJ III Understanding Directions is consistently one of the more cognitive complex tests. And, it is largely a language-based measure of working memory (Gsm-MW). Remember that as per the Radex model, cognitive complexity deals with the amount of elements/components that are processed.....and is not the same as abstract thinking (Gf-ish stuff). WJ III Numbers Reversed also shows up close to the center, with WISC-III Digit Span not far behind. Does this support the popular working memory=Gf/g research hypothesis?
- The Gc tests from both batteries appear similar in placement.
- As would be expected, the WJ III Gf tests (Concept Formation, Numerical Reasoning [which is a combo of Number Series and Number Matrices], and Analysis-Synthesis are within the center "cognitive complexity" circle.
A couple caveats I provided the other day are also relevant here--(a) I'm a coauthor of the WJ III (conflict of interest disclosure) and (b) these results have not been peer-reviewed
Labels:
CHC theory,
cognitive complexity,
cross-battery,
Ga,
Gf,
Glr,
Gq,
Gs,
Gsm,
Guttman,
Gv,
intelligence,
IQ tests,
math,
MDS,
psychometrics,
radex,
WISC-III,
WISC-IV,
WJ III,
working memory
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
WJ III EWOK (Evolving Web of Knowledge) v3.1 is now available
v3.1 of the WJ III EWOK (Evolving Web of Knowledge) is now available.Technorati Tags: psychology, educational psychology, education, school psychology, neuropsychology, special education, IQ, intelligene, IQ test, IQ scores, achievement, testing, WJ III, Woodcock Johnson, Normative Update, NU, Riverside Publishing
powered by performancing firefox
Labels:
EWOK,
WJ III,
WJ III EWOK
Braille Adaptation of WJ III Tests of Achievement
Thanks to Lynne Jaffe for providing an update on the Braille Adaptation of the WJ III Tests of Achievement. A description can be found at v3.1 of the WJ III EWOK If you want to skip the "big picture" of the WJ III EWOK and go directly past go, and go directly to the relevant information, click here.
Technorati Tags: psychology, school psychology, educational psychology, neuropsychology, vision impaired, blind, American Printing House for the Blind, APH, WJ III, achievement, testing
Technorati Tags: psychology, school psychology, educational psychology, neuropsychology, vision impaired, blind, American Printing House for the Blind, APH, WJ III, achievement, testing
Labels:
achievement,
braille,
math,
reading,
WJ III
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Computerized cognitive assessments
Interesting post from the most visible brain fitness company on the
Internet.
Internet.
http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2008/10/20/cognitive-assessments-headminder-anam-and-more/
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
PS caveat to prior WISCIII/W III study post
I failed to mention one additional important caveat in the prior
post. The study results I posted have not been peer-reviewed.
post. The study results I posted have not been peer-reviewed.
Sent from KMcGrew iPhone (IQMobile)
WISC-III/WJ III cross-battery g+specific cog-ach abilities findings
WISC-III/WJ III cross-battery g+specific abilities research reinforces "just say maybe" program of CHC g+specific abilities research.
I'm just starting the process of drafting a manuscript to summarize the results of the IAP CHC COG-ACH Correlates Meta-Analysis project (click here). In that on-line EWOK (Evolving Web of Knowledge) I list a McGrew (2007a) study in the reading and math summary tables. That reference reflects unpublished re-analysis I completed (last fall) with the Phelps et al. (2007) joint (cross-battery) WISC-III/WJ III dataset. In order to include the findings in the synthesis manuscript, I felt it appropriate to at least informally publish the final models for reference.
Two important caveats. I'm a coauthor of the WJ III (conflict of interest disclosure). The second caveat is outlined in the brief report of the results that I have posted. When I have time I will update the synthesis EWOK. I will change the reference to McGrew (2008) reflecting posting.
Technorati Tags: psychology, educational psychology, school psychology, neuropsychology, intelligence, IQ testing, IQ, Wechsler, WISC-III, WJ III, general intelligence, g, g+specific abilities
I'm just starting the process of drafting a manuscript to summarize the results of the IAP CHC COG-ACH Correlates Meta-Analysis project (click here). In that on-line EWOK (Evolving Web of Knowledge) I list a McGrew (2007a) study in the reading and math summary tables. That reference reflects unpublished re-analysis I completed (last fall) with the Phelps et al. (2007) joint (cross-battery) WISC-III/WJ III dataset. In order to include the findings in the synthesis manuscript, I felt it appropriate to at least informally publish the final models for reference.
Two important caveats. I'm a coauthor of the WJ III (conflict of interest disclosure). The second caveat is outlined in the brief report of the results that I have posted. When I have time I will update the synthesis EWOK. I will change the reference to McGrew (2008) reflecting posting.
Technorati Tags: psychology, educational psychology, school psychology, neuropsychology, intelligence, IQ testing, IQ, Wechsler, WISC-III, WJ III, general intelligence, g, g+specific abilities
Labels:
CHC theory,
cross-battery,
EWOK,
factor analysis,
g (gen IQ),
g+specific,
Ga,
Gf,
Glr,
Gq,
Grw,
Gs,
Gsm,
Gv,
math,
WISC-III,
WJ III
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

