Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Article Alert: AI tools for systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses in educational psychology: An overview and a practical guide - #AI #reviews #metaanalysis#EDPSY

 Click on images to enlarge for easy reading



This is an open access article that can be read or downloaded by clicking here.


A B S T R A C T

The rapid growth of research literature has made systematic reviews and meta-analyses increasingly time-consuming, limiting their utility in fast-evolving fields such as educational psychology. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have enormous potential to streamline these processes, yet their adoption remains limited due to usability issues and a lack of systematic guidance. Out of 282 tools that we compiled from overviews that listed AI tools for research syntheses, we filtered a subset of 7 AI tools that met quality standards, such as transparency and accessibility. These tools were evaluated for their potential to support systematic reviews and meta-analyses in educational psychology. Our review highlights the tools' strengths, limitations, and ethical considerations for their responsible use by providing practical guidance and coding information. Educational relevance statement: This research identifies and evaluates AI tools that streamline systematic reviews and meta-analyses, addressing critical challenges in synthesizing educational psychology research. By making these processes more efficient, accessible, and accurate, the study empowers educators and researchers to derive timely insights into diverse learner needs. Practically, the findings guide the adoption of AI tools that reduce workload and cognitive bias, enabling more evidence-based and inclusive educational practices. This work supports the advancement of scientifically rigorous methods that enhance understanding of individual differences in learning, directly contributing to improved educational interventions and outcomes

Independent review of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities - #WJV #CHC #cognitive #intelligence #schoolpsychologists #schoolpsychology #SLD #SPED

 


Abstract

The Woodcock–Johnson V Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ V COG), published in February 2025, offers the latest edition of the WJ family of tests alongside tests of academic achievement and oral language. The WJ V COG has changed substantially from previous editions regarding administration, which is now entirely digital. Administration and scoring are housed within the Riverside Insight's online platform. The test battery features several changes, such as the addition of five new tests and the removal of three tests, including measures of Auditory Processing (Ga). The WJ V COG maintains a CHC-based theoretical framework, although updated to align with current theory. Psychometric evidence, including validity, reliability, and item-level analysis, is robust. Evidence is less convincing for children under six. The assessment was co-normed with measures of academic achievement, and the norm sample was gathered post-COVID. Although some may find requirements of digital administration limiting, the WJ V COG offers an engaging and psychometrically sound option for the assessment of intelligence.

Keywords:  assessment, intelligence, cognitive, digital administration, test review

The above independent review of the WJ V cognitive battery is now available for reading (and downloading) as an open access article at the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment.

COI statement:  I, Dr. Kevin McGrew, am senior author of the WJ V.  However, I no longer (as in the past with the WJ III through WJ IV) have a royalty interest in the in the WJ V—I make ZERO income based on how many are sold.  The publisher moved to a new independent contractor reimbursement model where the authors were paid for work on the WJ V prior to publication.  However, I clearly have a potential professional non-income based COI given my lengthy history with the WJ batteries and my professional reputation.  I do still receive royalties for sales of the WJ IV. I also have no post-publication contract (or COI) to work on any new features that the publisher adds to the digital product after the formal release in Feb 2025, which as a digital product, can add new features on a semi-regular basis. In other words, consider me an “unrestricted free agent” in the intelligence testing space.  ðŸ˜‰

Monday, December 08, 2025

IQ McGrew’s Recommended Reading: How Human Personality [and Intelligence] Will [May?] Change With the Use of Artificial Intelligence - #recrdg #personality #intelligence #AI #CHC #artificialintellignece #psychology #schoolpsychology #schoolpsychologists


Click on images to enlarge for easier reading





I seldom designate an article as a recommended reading. I typically make FYI posts about new research I finding interesting in my small corner of the larger sandbox of psychology…more as FYI alerts.  I break with my typical FYI research alert blogging behavior for this article by Dr. John D. Mayer.  I recommend reading Mayer’s thought provoking article—especially since it is open source and can be downloaded and read for free (click here to access).

Why?  Because it is a well-reasoned “thought piece” about the many unanswered questions regarding the potential positive and negative impact of AI on humans, in this case, human personality and cognition.  I’m relatively new to the fast-moving AI movement and, as an educational psychologist, I’m interested in how certain cognitive abilities (especially CHC cognitive abilities) may become “skilled” or “deskilled” with greater reliance on AI.  

Abstract

People change as they form new habits, encounter new situations, and mature. As people interact with artificial intelligence (AI), their personalities will change, including their emotional responses to AI, their cognition, and their self-understanding. The present theoretical integration draws together empirical studies of how personality changes in response to technological innovations, and to AI in particular. Research studies reviewed were selected according to their relevance and quality. Some key points include that (a) as AI becomes increasingly human-like, and humans represent themselves online, humans and bots become increasingly difficult to distinguish; (b) as people rely on AI as a coach to guide them in interpersonal interactions, they may become socially deskilled; and, (c) as they rely on AI for work tasks, they may become cognitively deskilled in key areas. These changes in personality will entail an overall shift in people’s self-concepts. Psychologists can track these changes by classifying people’s types of AI interactions and relating them to relevant personality attributes.

Sunday, December 07, 2025

Supreme Court to consider the role of #IQ tests in ban on executing people who are #intellectually disabled (#ID)- #SCOTUSblog: #schoolpsychology #schoolpsychologists #intelligence



An email quick-blog post FYI.
 
If you want more information, including amicus briefs for the defendent from professional groups (APA, AAIDD), visit a special post at IQs Corner blog—-
 
Court to consider the role of IQ tests in ban on executing people who are intellectually disabled - SCOTUSblog 
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/court-to-consider-the-role-of-iq-tests-in-ban-on-executing-people-who-are-intellectually-disabled/

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Monday, December 01, 2025

New study on early smartphone use (around age 12) suggests potential physical and mental health issues

Interesting FYI email-based quick post.  Nice to see the authors remind us that correlation does not prove causation. But……..
 

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Sunday, November 30, 2025

IQs Corner: #Cloze test performance and #cognitive abilities: A comprehensive #meta-analysis - #intelligence #Grw #Gc #CHC #g #Gf #schoolpsychologists #schoolpsychologt

This is an open access article that can be read/downloaded at this link.

Click on image to enlarge



Abstract

Cloze tests have a long history and have been used to measure various abilities, including intelligence, reading comprehension, and language proficiency. To locate cloze tests within a nomological network of cognitive abilities, we conducted a multilevel random effects meta-analysis covering 110 years of research. Studies were eligible if they provided a measure of association between a cognitive fill-in-the-blank test and any cognitive ability test. We synthesized manifest correlations from 89 studies (N = 37,912, k = 634) and found an average correlation of r = .54 (95% CI [.49, .59], k = 485) with crystallized intelligence, r = .48 (95% CI [.42, .54], k = 69) with fluid intelligence, and r =.61 (95% CI [.46, .77], k = 32) with general intelligence. While today's application of the typical cloze is to measure reading comprehension, our results revealed a similarly strong association with a broad range of crystallized abilities. Of the key moderators we investigated—text base, administration mode, deletion pattern, and response type—only the response type showed a significant effect. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our findings. We conclude by revisiting the origin of the cloze test and highlighting the need for systematic studies on how different cloze test designs affect construct validity. Whereas the meta-analytic database predominantly originates from language research, where cloze tests are entrenched as markers of language proficiency, we propose reframing cloze tests as a versatile intelligence test format—just like multiple-choice tests constitute a testing method—that can be tailored to assess various specific cognitive abilities.

Thursday, November 27, 2025

Uncovering the Complex Effects of #SocioeconomicStatus (#SES) and #ExecutiveFunctions on Academic #Achievement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | Educational Psychology Review

Quick email sent blog FYI post
 
Uncovering the Complex Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Executive Functions on Academic Achievement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis | Educational Psychology Review 
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-025-10091-7

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Cognitive profile of individuals with #borderline #intellectual functioning: A systematic review—#BIF #intelligence #school psychologists #schoolpsychologyn#AAIDD

Click image to enlarge



Quick email based blog post.  This is an open access article—you can download the PDF copy for this article
 
Cognitive profile of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning: A systematic review - ScienceDirect 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289625000777

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Factor structure of the Japanese #WAIS-IV: Evidence for the #CHC theory using #Bayesian analysis

Quick email-based FYI article post.  Click link to view more about the article
 
Factor structure of the Japanese WAIS-IV: Evidence for the CHC theory using Bayesian analysis - ScienceDirect 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289625000765

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Sunday, November 23, 2025

The importance of attention for variation in learning to learn —#Gwm #AC #learning

 
Quick email sent blog post.
 
And yet another study demonstrating the central role of attentional control (Gwm-AC as per CHC) in learning.
 
The importance of attention for variation in learning to learn - ScienceDirect 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749596X25001044
 
"Collectively, these results suggest that individual differences in learning to learn are associated with variation in the ability to manage different aspects of attention during learning as well as motivational and strategic factors."

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Saturday, November 22, 2025

How is spatial reasoning associated with mathematical ability? Evidence based on a meta-analysis - ScienceDirect

How is spatial reasoning associated with mathematical ability? Evidence based on a meta-analysis - ScienceDirect 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608025002146
 
Quick FYI email blog post
 

Abstract

Despite extensive research exploring the relationship between various spatial reasoning and mathematical abilities, there is rare evidence of their integrated effects and relational specificity. Using the meta-analysis method, this study estimated the spatial reasoning-mathematics correlation and analysed the potential moderating effects of spatial reasoning factors (i.e., spatial visualisation, mental rotation, and spatial orientation), mathematical domains (i.e., numerical, arithmetic, geometric, logical reasoning, and comprehensive math), and age (i.e., preschoolers, children, adolescents, and adults). After integrating 62 studies with 239 effect sizes, a moderate correlation (r = 0.31, 95 % CI [0.29, 0.33]) was identified between spatial reasoning and mathematics; spatial visualisation and spatial orientation showed stronger associations with mathematical ability than mental rotation; comprehensive math, geometry and logical reasoning exhibited superior correlations with spatial reasoning than arithmetic. In addition, no relational differences were detected among preschoolers, children, adolescents, and adults. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)
 
 
*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************

 

Screen Time in Tweens Predicts ADHD, Slower Brain Growth

Quick email-to-blog FYI post
 
Screen Time in Tweens Predicts ADHD, Slower Brain Growth 
https://neurosciencenews.com/screentime-adhd-neurodevelopment-29964/

Pardon typos and spelling errors-Message may be sent from iPhone and I've always had spelling problems :)

*****************************************
Kevin S. McGrew, PhD
Educational & School Psychologist
Director
Institute for Applied Psychometrics (IAP)
https://www.themindhub.com
******************************************