Showing posts with label emotion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emotion. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 01, 2025

National Academies report: Blueprint for national prevention infrastructure for #mental #emotional #behavioraldisorders

Available to download for free at this link.


SUMMARY

Substance use disorder and overdose, suicide, and youth mental illness are major public health crises that cost the United States in lives, human potential, productivity, and resources. Government agencies at the federal, state, tribal, and local levels work together with health care entities, academic institutions, communities, and community-based organizations to respond to these crises largely with treatment and recovery services. Mental, emotional, and behavioral (MEB) disorders are mental and substance use disorders and associated problem behaviors, even if they do not meet diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Less attention and fewer resources are dedicated to delivering services specifically devoted to preventing such disorders and promoting MEB health and overall well-being. Greater support for prevention could minimize the pain and suffering associated with MEB disorders, and, critically, reduce the burden on overtaxed treatment and recovery systems.

This report provides a blueprint to develop the infrastructure to deliver programs that reduce risk factors (characteristics associated with a higher likelihood of negative outcomes) and promote protective factors (characteristics that can reduce the negative impact of a risk factor and promote better outcomes) for MEB disorders across the life course and in an array of settings. The committee’s charge was to outline the components and requirements of a well-functioning infrastructure to support the delivery of evidence-based programs at federal, state, tribal, and local levels.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2025. Blueprint for a National Prevention Infrastructure for Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/28577.

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Reseach byte: Working memory training (Gwm) may improve emotion regulation ability

Working memory training improves emotion regulation ability: Evidence from HRV


Highlights

The training group's working memory capacity was increased after training.
The HF-HRV in emotion regulation condition was enhanced by training.
Working memory training improves emotion regulation ability.

Abstract

Emotion regulation during social situations plays a pivotal role in health and interpersonal functioning. In this study, we propose a working memory training approach to improve emotion regulation ability. This training promotes an updating function that is a crucial modulated process for emotion regulation. In the present study, the participants in the training group completed a running memory task over 20 days of training. Their working memory capability and high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV) data on pretest and posttest were assessed and analyzed. Compared with the control group, the training group's reaction time in the 2-back working memory task was reduced significantly. In addition, the HF-HRV in the emotion regulation condition was increased after the 20-day training, which indicates that the working memory training effect could transfer to emotion regulation. In other words, working memory training improved emotion regulation ability.

Keywords

  • Emotion regulation;
  • Working memory training;
  • High-frequency HRV;
  • Attention control

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Is crying good for you? It depends


[double click to enlarge image]

This post about crying behavior is way off task for the focus of my blog. But the title of the article captured my attention, and upon further review, I discovered, much to my delight (and preference for good model-based research) that the article presented a nice conceptual/theoretical model for understanding crying behavior.


Bottom line---according to Rottenberg et al. (2008) a "good cry" may be beneficial...but sometimes it is not and it may exacerbate stress. Crying, like many human behaviors, is the result of a complex interaction of personal individual difference variables and environmental settings. The authors model (see nice visual-graphic represenation above) suggests that the pros/cons of crying are a function of (a) how crying behavior is measured in research, (b) the conditions in the social environment in which a person is operating, (c) individual personality traits of the crier, and (d) the affective (emotional) state of the crier at the time.

Having a "good cry" is not always beneficial...but sometimes it is. Again...the complexity of human behavior is confirmed.

It all "depends"..........

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,