Showing posts with label Riverside. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Riverside. Show all posts

Saturday, January 11, 2025

#WJV #CE option for forthcoming #CAI “State of the art of #SLD identification” (with special focus on the new #WJV) - #WJV #RiversideInsights #SLD #schoolpsychology #SLD

 


I was asked to pass-along a reminder from the CAI group that in its upcoming 2nd annual webinar (in collaboration with Riverside Insights) re State of the Art of SLD identification, they will be offering a variety of CE options.  Info regarding the webinar, CE’s and registration is available here.  I will be presenting an Overview of the WJ V Cognitive Battery.

As sent to me by CAI staff—“CAI will offer a micro-credential on the WJ V following the conference: WJ V: Overview and Research Applications (a 10-hour on-demand training).  Anyone who registers for the conference can pay an additional $39 to earn the micro-credential (which involves completing assignments to demonstrate competency).”

Sunday, August 23, 2009

WJ III RPI and W-scores: New ASB explanatory report available

What are RPI (Relative Proficiency Index) and W-scores...how do they differ from standard scores?  Why are they the most educationally relevant scores provided by the Woodcock-Johnson III Battery [conflict of interest - I'm a coauthor of the WJ III].

Answers to these important questions are now available in ASB # 11:  Development, Interpretation, and Application of the W Score and the Relative Proficiency Index a new Assessment Service Bulletin available from Riverside Publishing.  The author of the ASB is Dr. Lynne Jaffe.  Click here to access the Riverside web page that lists ASB # 11 (and all prior ASB's).

As described at the Riverside web page:
  • The purpose of this bulletin is to familiarize users of the WJ III with the development, interpretation, and application of the W score and the RPI. Specifically, this bulletin describes the levels of interpretive information available in the WJ III, explains the special characteristics and usefulness of the W scale, and describes how the RPI fits into the hierarchy of information used to interpret test results, including, the differences between the RPI and peer-comparison scores, the usefulness of the RPI in clarifying diagnostic profiles and designing interventions and considerations for using the RPI in view of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2004, and the use of the RPI in clinical research.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 03, 2008

WJ III NU (Normative Update) Assessment Service Bulletin #9 available



I'm pleased to announce that the Woodcock-Johnson III Assessment Service Bulletin 9: Woodcock-Johnson III®/Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update Score Differences: What the User Can Expect and Why (click here to view/download) is now available. I want to thank all users for their patience during the delay in this publication. Below is the introduction to the document.

I want to thank Riverside Publishing for allowing me to post this publication today. In a few weeks it will be available for their web page. At that time I'll make a new post with the official link to the publication then being their web page.

[Conflict of interest disclosure - I'm a coauthor of the WJ III]

  • The Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update (WJ III® NU) (Woodcock, McGrew, Schrank, & Mather, 2001, 2007) is a recalculation of the normative data for the Woodcock-Johnson III (WJ III) (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001), based on the final 2000 U.S. census statistics (U.S. Census Bureau, 2005). The final 2000 census data are reflected in the norms provided by the WJ III Normative Update Compuscore® and Profiles Program (Compuscore) (Schrank & Woodcock, 2007) and in the documentation provided in the WJ III Normative Update Technical Manual (McGrew, Schrank, & Woodcock, 2007). The WJ III NU norms replace the original WJ III norms, which were based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2000 census projections issued in 1996 (Day, 1996).
  • The U.S. Census Bureau’s Population Projections Program issues projections of the United States resident population based on assumptions about future births, deaths, and international migration. Census projections are estimates of the population for future dates and are subsequently replaced by census statistics. The 2000 census statistics produced a somewhat different description of the U.S. population than was assumed from the last projections issued in 1996. For example, according to the bureau’s Greg Spencer, “When we took the 2000 census, we found about 6.8 million more people than we were expecting. When we went in and looked at the sources of that growth, we found that during the late 1990s, there was more migration than we had been measuring” (Landphair, 2004, p. 1). Other unanticipated changes in the population were documented (U.S. Census Bureau, 2005), including shifts in age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, and residence. Some states grew at three times the national rate, and people tended to cluster in locations where jobs were available and climate was preferred. For users of the WJ III, the normative update (WJ III NU) provides the most current comparisons to the U.S. population.
  • In addition, the WJ III NU used innovative statistical advancements to calculate the new norms. The use of bootstrap resampling procedures (Efron & Tibshirani, 1993) allowed for estimates of uncertainty and potential bias (in the sample data) to be incorporated into the calculation of the WJ III NU norms. The bootstrap-based norm development procedures used to recalculate WJ III NU norms result in more precise estimates of an individual’s tested performance. Collectively, the refinement of the demographic characteristics in the WJ III NU norm data, based on updated U.S. census statistics, and the use of state-of-the-art statistical methods for estimating the sample statistics used to calculate norms allow users of the WJ III to have greater confidence in the accuracy of the WJ III NU-based scores.


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.